Samsung M8: A Better Alternative to Apple’s Studio Display?
Written on
Chapter 1: Apple’s Studio Display Underwhelms
Apple’s Studio Display has not met expectations, and it's important to address the shortcomings candidly. Since the launch of the Pro Display XDR, I had been anticipating a more user-friendly version for everyday consumers. Unfortunately, what I received this past Spring fell short.
To fully understand the situation, let's examine the key issues with Apple’s Studio Display.
Section 1.1: Major Flaws in Design
One glaring problem is the hefty price tag of $1599. At this cost, one would expect a lot of features. For instance, Face ID is noticeably absent, despite the presence of a webcam. The most troubling aspect, however, is the non-removable power cable located at the back.
It’s unusual for a monitor to have a power cable that cannot be detached, and this is not the first instance of Apple making such a decision. When the HomePod was launched, it too featured a fixed cable. This design flaw means that if the cable fails, the entire display must be serviced.
Section 1.2: Missing Features
As previously mentioned, the absence of Face ID is disappointing. For a monitor priced this high, I expected more features, even if it doesn’t match the brightness of the Pro Display XDR. Additionally, the webcam only supports 720p resolution, which leaves much to be desired.
Subsection 1.2.1: The Stand Dilemma
Apple faced significant backlash for not including a stand with the Pro Display XDR. The stand that accompanies the Studio Display is functional, but it only allows for tilt adjustments. If you want a height-adjustable option, it will set you back an extra $400, bringing the total cost to $1999.
Section 1.3: Conclusion on Studio Display
In summary, the Studio Display lacks key features such as Face ID, has a non-removable power cable, and offers limited stand options. While it uses a single-backlight LCD, the combination of these shortcomings is disappointing, particularly the need for a detachable power cable and a more reasonably priced adjustable stand.
Chapter 2: The Samsung M8 Display
Recently, I encountered the Samsung M8 4K display, which is available in four colors and priced at $699. Although I haven't had the chance to test it myself, I would like to discuss the features it offers.
Section 2.1: Overview of Samsung M8
First off, it provides a 4K resolution, unlike the 5K resolution of the Studio Display. It feels more like a competitor to the new 24-inch iMac rather than a direct rival to Apple’s offering. The design of the Samsung M8’s stand is notably similar and comes in a variety of colors.
The Samsung M8 is aimed at casual users, making it a more accessible choice compared to the Studio Display, which is tailored for independent creators. Additionally, the M8 has been designed as a “smart monitor,” incorporating smart TV functionalities.
Section 2.2: Smart Features
Another significant advantage is the M8's capability to connect with iOS devices through AirPlay, positioning itself as a potential alternative to the iMac.
At a price point of $699, the Samsung M8 presents a compelling argument for consumers considering alternatives to Apple’s Studio Display. Personally, I hope that Apple revisits the design of the Studio Display, particularly by introducing a removable power cable. Once I complete my office renovation, I may consider purchasing the Samsung M8 instead.
In conclusion, it seems Apple has missed the mark with the Studio Display.