Maximize Your Code Review Skills with These 5 Essential Rules
Written on
Chapter 1: The Importance of Code Reviews
Code reviews serve as the backbone of a successful software engineering team. This process occurs when a developer requests that their modifications be integrated into the primary development branch. During this phase, peers and senior members can provide feedback and propose changes via version control platforms like Git and GitLab.
These reviews mark the transition from individual contributions to collective responsibility regarding the central codebase. The essence of code reviews lies in this shift: initial ownership from one or two developers evolves into shared ownership. Once the code is merged, any bugs or issues become a collective concern rather than an individual one.
In today's remote work environment, the significance of code reviews cannot be overstated. Allocating sufficient time to review a teammate’s code is crucial. A team that conducts thorough code reviews benefits from adherence to industry standards, faster onboarding of new developers, and the creation of robust software.
For those who often default to simply clicking “Approve,” it's time to step up and embrace the following five essential rules for effective code reviews.
Section 1.1: Always Express Your Thoughts
It may seem straightforward, but being aware of your thoughts during a code review is vital. If you're a newcomer and find yourself puzzled by the code, it’s important to communicate your confusion. Consider reaching out to your teammates through messaging apps before commenting on the merge request.
Even experienced developers often seek clarification. The answer might range from a simple comment explaining a byte manipulation to a complete algorithm overhaul. Clear understanding is essential for the team.
Imagine if senior developers at your company chose to remain silent when confused about code in a merge request. The chaos that would ensue illustrates the importance of voicing concerns, especially for junior developers. Asking questions is a pathway to learning, while staying silent only perpetuates confusion.
Section 1.2: Grasp the Acceptance Criteria
Understanding the Acceptance Criteria (AC) is crucial in both directions. Firstly, you need to comprehend the goals of the merge request. Secondly, it’s essential to see how the proposed changes align with these objectives. This involves delving into each level of abstraction.
To begin grasping the AC, review the ticket linked to the merge request, which should outline the overarching goals and implementation details. If you're the author, consider providing extra context in the description of your merge request, highlighting any tricky parts of the code.
If you're on the reviewing side, understanding the AC is equally important. Instead of merely scanning the change list on GitLab, pull the branch and experiment with the new changes. Run test cases, observe build times, and if confusion arises, don’t hesitate to comment in the code review while adhering to the first rule.
Section 1.3: Keep Changes Concise
Opening a merge request that contains over 1,000 lines of code can be daunting for reviewers. Ideally, your merge request should range between ten and 100 lines. While it may appear challenging, there are effective strategies to ensure concise code reviews.
Start by ensuring your .gitignore file is properly configured. This file informs Git which files to disregard, often related to IDEs or dependencies from frameworks like Angular.
Additionally, promote daily code reviews. By prefixing your merge request titles with “WIP” (Work In Progress) or “Draft,” you allow your team to begin reviewing and commenting on your changes without the risk of merging prematurely. Daily reviews enhance team visibility into ongoing changes and prevent the bottlenecks associated with large, unwieldy code reviews.
Chapter 2: Establishing Team Standards
Do you know your team's conventions for naming functions? Are there guidelines for testing limits or code coverage? As a team member, you should be aware of these standards. Establishing a shared document outlining development best practices is highly beneficial. If such a document doesn’t exist, consider taking the initiative to create one.
Documenting these standards not only aids your teammates but also deepens your understanding of best practices within the team.
Section 2.1: Striking the Right Balance
Navigating code reviews requires a delicate balance. You must provide detailed feedback without overwhelming your teammates. Respect is essential, but so is honesty. Moreover, it’s important to be proactive rather than reactive.
Ultimately, code reviews center around shared ownership. Once code is merged, it belongs to the entire team, and no single person should shoulder the credit or blame. It’s your responsibility to determine how best to contribute to the code review process. Always prioritize the first rule: share your thoughts.
As you participate in code reviews, don’t hesitate to ask questions. If you have no queries, consider offering suggestions or compliments on your colleague’s work. Feedback—whether positive or negative—can significantly boost morale.
Conclusion
I hope this article has provided you with valuable insights to improve your code review practices. If you have any tips or daily routines that enhance your code reviews, I encourage you to share them in the comments below!
The first video titled "Reviewing the Code Review" explores best practices and common pitfalls in the code review process, shedding light on how to effectively conduct reviews and provide constructive feedback.
The second video, "Code Review Best Practices," outlines essential strategies for conducting effective code reviews, ensuring that they contribute positively to team dynamics and software quality.